SBIR-STTR Award

Integration of neural networks and expert systems in machine diagnosis
Award last edited on: 3/21/2002

Sponsored Program
SBIR
Awarding Agency
NSF
Total Award Amount
$275,023
Award Phase
2
Solicitation Topic Code
-----

Principal Investigator
David A Hornig

Company Information

Carnegie Group Inc

Five PPG Place
Pittsburgh, PA 15222
   (412) 642-6900
   N/A
   www.logica.com
Location: Multiple
Congr. District: 18
County: Allegheny

Phase I

Contract Number: 8860373
Start Date: 00/00/00    Completed: 00/00/00
Phase I year
1988
Phase I Amount
$49,517
Expert system technology has been proven effective in reactive diagnosis, that is, diagnosing the causes of machine failures after they occur. However, expert systems have been less effective in replicating human expertise in proactive diagnosis, the prediction of impending failures. One reason for this lack of success is that predicative diagnosis often depends on finding patterns in vibrational or acoustic signals ("the lifters sound sticky") rather than on symbolic reasoning.Current commercial computer-based diagnosis systems are not well suited to dealing with these signal processing tasks, since these expert systems usually rely on explicit programming or knowledge entry, and experts rarely know how they perform these recognition tasks. However, recent advances in neurocomputing have resulted in systems which learn to recognize patterns in signals without being explicitly programmed to look for them. The work covered in this proposal investigates an architecture that combines the symptom classification ability of neural networks with the symbolic reasoning of a diagnostic expert system.Commercial Applications:The research developed will create a system that can monitor a unit's vibrational patterns for possible failures then use expert systems technology to refine the diagnosis and step the user through a repair.

Phase II

Contract Number: ----------
Start Date: 00/00/00    Completed: 00/00/00
Phase II year
1990
Phase II Amount
$225,506
___(NOTE: Note: no official Abstract exists of this Phase II projects. Abstract is modified by idi from relevant Phase I data. The specific Phase II work statement and objectives may differ)___ Expert system technology has been proven effective in reactive diagnosis, that is, diagnosing the causes of machine failures after they occur. However, expert systems have been less effective in replicating human expertise in proactive diagnosis, the prediction of impending failures. One reason for this lack of success is that predicative diagnosis often depends on finding patterns in vibrational or acoustic signals ("the lifters sound sticky") rather than on symbolic reasoning.Current commercial computer-based diagnosis systems are not well suited to dealing with these signal processing tasks, since these expert systems usually rely on explicit programming or knowledge entry, and experts rarely know how they perform these recognition tasks. However, recent advances in neurocomputing have resulted in systems which learn to recognize patterns in signals without being explicitly programmed to look for them. The work covered in this proposal investigates an architecture that combines the symptom classification ability of neural networks with the symbolic reasoning of a diagnostic expert system.Commercial Applications:The research developed will create a system that can monitor a unit's vibrational patterns for possible failures then use expert systems technology to refine the diagnosis and step the user through a repair.