Out-of-pocket (OOP) costs of cancer treatment are increasing as patients pay more of their health care costs in general, including higher insurance premiums and higher deductibles, co-insurance, and copayments. Cancer delivery has been described as a system in crisis as the financial burden of treatment costs affects nearly half of newly-diagnosed cancer patients. In this Phase I SBIR project, we will build and test Cancer Out-Of-Pocket Estimator (COOPE), a mobile/web system to assist with financial counseling for cancer patients initiating new cancer treatments. Following three specific aims, we will use a human-centered design (HCD) approach to develop a system for primary use by financial counselors working directly with patients. In Aim 1, we will conduct a requirements analysis with 20 potential system end users (financial counselors, cancer patients and their caregivers, oncologists, authorization representatives) to probe current perceptions of cancer cost discussions and the availability of estimated OOP cost data before initiation of patient treatment. In Aim 2, we will build a user-informed prototype of COOPE based on recommendations and specifications identified and outlined in Aim 1. The prototype will be reviewed by financial counselors and iterated to generate a version that will be used in subsequent field testing. In Aim 3, we will conduct a pilot study using mixed methods to study the use of COOPE in financial counseling at an urban, tertiary safety net hospital participating in the Oncology Care Model (OCM). We will examine usability and usefulness, usage patterns, perceived knowledge of cost information, patient satisfaction, accuracy of estimates, and financial distress. Measures of usability and usefulness (i.e., SEQ, UMUX-Lite) will be used to assess system acceptability and determine the potential of a Phase II project. Results of this Phase I SBIR project will go towards further development and validation of a pilot system to assess the effects of this system on financial planning and financial toxicity.
Public Health Relevance Statement: PROJECT NARRATIVE Cancer delivery has been described as a system in crisis as the financial burden of treatment costs affects nearly half of newly-diagnosed cancer patients. This Phase I SBIR project will use a human-centered design approach to design, develop, and test the feasibility and acceptability of a novel mobile/web system to assist cancer patients and their care teams in the navigation of out-of-pocket (OOP) costs for cancer treatment. The system will be expressly designed to support the critical and currently ill-supported work of financial counselors in coordination with oncologists and other members of the care team to improve financial transparency and assist in the identification of opportunities for financial assistance and/or other more affordable drug alternatives to patients. Results will inform future development of tools to designed to mitigate financial toxicity.
Project Terms: Academy; Address; Affect; Architecture; Authorization documentation; Back; base; Benchmarking; beneficiary; cancer care; Cancer Patient; cancer therapy; cancer type; care costs; Caregivers; Caring; Client satisfaction; Clinical; Clinical effectiveness; cohort; Communication; Companions; Comprehension; Controlled Study; copayment; cost; cost estimate; Counseling; dashboard; Data; Deductibles; design; Development; digital; Dose; Drug Prescriptions; Enrollment; Fee-for-Service Plans; Feedback; field study; Financial Hardship; Financial Support; financial toxicity; follow-up; Future; Goals; Health Care Costs; Health system; Hospitals; Human; improved; Industry; informant; Institute of Medicine (U.S.); Insurance; Internet; Interview; Knowledge; malignant mouth neoplasm; Malignant Neoplasms; Measures; Medicare; Medicine; member; Methods; mobile application; Modeling; Newly Diagnosed; novel; novel anticancer drug; Oncologist; Oncology; Online Systems; Patients; Pattern; Perception; Pharmaceutical Preparations; Pharmacotherapy; Phase; Pilot Projects; Process; Professional counselor; prototype; Recommendation; Reporting; safety net; Sampling; Small Business Innovation Research Grant; Structure; success; Surveys; System; Technology; tertiary care; Testing; Time; tool; tool development; Treatment Cost; United States Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services; Urban Hospitals; usability; Validation; web app; Work
