Non-Meat and Poultry Product (Non-MPP) food processing plants manage their effluent to satisfy environmental regulations concerning waste discharge. Currently, many non-MPP plants mechanically screen out large pieces of organic material (biosolids) that are processed for use as livestock feed. However, minute biosolids in liquid suspension collected from the food plant's effluent are generally disposed of by land application or by land filling due to contamination by chemicals used to flocculate the biosolids out of the wastewater. APS will test the feasibility of using PFC, a new flocculation compound, across a broad spectrum of non-MPP processing industry segments to recover unadulterated digestible nutrients useable as livestock feed. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this project are to 1) estimate the optimum injection rate of a new patented wastewater flocculating compound identified as PFC, 2) estimate and prioritize the nutritional and economic value of biosolids reclaimed utilizing PFC, and 3) estimate the variable cost impact of utilizing PFC versus the current wastewater treatment program in use at numerous non-Meat and Poultry Product (non-MPP) food processing plants. APPROACH: This study will include the analysis of liquid samples and solid samples generated during bench tests at individual non-Meat and Poultry Product (non-MPP) food processing plants using PFC, a recently patented wastewater flocculating compound. This evaluation will include the collection of information concerning waste and wastewater treatment costs currently experienced at ten (10) non-MPP processing plants from across food industry sectors which will include corn, potato, bakery, vegetable, and fruit processing. Adjustments to the PFC treatment protocol including pH adjustment, PFC concentration, and PFC formulation will be evaluated to optimize PFC effectiveness in wastewater treatment at each individual food processing facility. The numerous liquid fractions collected over the course of the remote site testing will be analyzed individually for Total Suspended Solids (TSS), Phosphorus (P), Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD), Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN), Nitrogen Ammonia (NH3), pH, Magnesium (Mg), and Aluminum (Al). The numerous solid fractions (biosolids) collected over the course of the remote site testing will be consolidated into a single, homogeneous sample at each individual facility and dewatered into a cake using a portable bench top belt press simulator to approximate the moisture content and material consistency expected from industrial grade belt press systems. The cake will be analyzed for Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen (TKN), Individual Amino Acids, Fat, Ash, Phosphorus (P), Magnesium (Mg), Aluminum (Al), and Moisture Content (post portable press). The solid fraction analysis will be used in a comparison study to estimate nutrient content and economic value of the cake relative to comparable livestock feed ingredients. Confidential discussions with management at each of the non-MPP food processing plants will be used to identify the total cost for treating, processing, and disposing of the biosolids collected from the wastewater treatment system at each individual food processing facility. This information will include current biosolid disposal transportation cost per ton, current biosolid disposal cost per ton, current biosolid generation per 1,000 gallons of wastewater, current gallons of wastewater generated per day/week, current wastewater treatment cost per 1,000 gallons, and current wastewater treatment direct labor cost. This costing information combined with other data developed during the course of this research plus other relevant capital asset information will be used to estimate the variance in total wastewater treatment costs at each individual plant using the PFC treatment protocol versus the current wastewater treatment program in use at any particular non-MPP food processing facility. This analysis will be used to generate the expected variance in capital equipment cost, the expected variance in energy cost, the expected variance in chemical cost, the expected variance in labor cost, the expected variance in total biosolid disposal cost, and the expected variance in total waste/wastewater treatment cost