SBIR-STTR Award

Sorbent Traps for Continuous Measurement of Metal HAP Emissions
Award last edited on: 9/22/2024

Sponsored Program
SBIR
Awarding Agency
EPA
Total Award Amount
$499,950
Award Phase
2
Solicitation Topic Code
2D
Principal Investigator
Jonathan Cross

Company Information

Ohio Lumex Co Inc (AKA: AMERITEST )

30350 Bruce Industrial Parkway
Solon, OH 44139
   (440) 264-2500
   N/A
   www.ohiolumex.com
Location: Single
Congr. District: 07
County: Cuyahoga

Phase I

Contract Number: 68HERC22C0011
Start Date: 12/1/2021    Completed: 5/31/2022
Phase I year
2022
Phase I Amount
$99,950
During this Phase I SBIR research project, Ohio Lumex will develop a sorbent trap method for continuous emissions monitoring of metal hazardous air pollutant (HAP) emissions. If this method is promulgated by EPA, it may also be used as an alternative to Method 29 for short-term testing. Metal HAP emissions from stationary sources are currently determined using emissions factors derived from intermittent stack testing measurements, input feed stream data, and plant operating parameters. Emissions factors may have significant uncertainty, particularly for sources where feed stream metal content is highly variable. Continuous measurements are needed to provide superior accuracy, but current technology is limited and cost prohibitive. The proposed technology would meet that need with repetitive in-stack sampling using paired sorbent traps with periodic analysis of time-integrated samples collected over a period of several days. This approach is analogous to Performance Specification 12B (PS 12B). Previous work by the Energy & Environmental Research Center (EERC) evaluated the feasibility of a sorbent trap reference method for metals. They determined the background metals on the sorbent were too high to accurately quantify several metals. EERC determined additional research was needed to evaluate other sorbent materials. This SBIR research will evaluate several sorbent materials and sampling durations of up to seven days. The proposed method is applicable to several industries. It will be designed with particular focus on continuous sampling for hazardous waste combustors, metal smelting operations, iron and steel production, secondary smelting facilities, and coal-fired power plants. However, if this method is ultimately promulgated by EPA, it could also be used for short-term (1-4 hours) sampling in lieu of EPA Method 29 for any facility that currently uses Method 29 (within applicable point source categories). The end user for this product depends on the application. For continuous measurements, plants (stationary sources) will purchase these traps for use in continuous sampling equipment. For short-term sampling as an alternative to Method 29, the customers are stack testing companies. Other customer categories will be discussed in the proposal. Continuous measurement of metal HAP emissions will improve EPA’s air emissions inventory and allow point sources to better understand their emissions. Sources that utilize control technologies to remove metals from the gas stream can use this information to optimize controls. For short-term testing, this method will benefit stack testers, who almost universally agree Method 29 is cumbersome, expensive, and hazardous.

Phase II

Contract Number: 68HERC23C0002
Start Date: 10/21/2022    Completed: 10/20/2024
Phase II year
2023
Phase II Amount
$400,000
During this Phase II SBIR research project, Ohio Lumex will complete development of a sorbent trap method for continuous emissions monitoring of metal hazardous air pollutant (HAP) emissions. If method sensitivity is sufficient and the method is approved by EPA, it may also be used as an alternative to Method 29 for short-duration testing. Metal HAP emissions from stationary sources are currently determined using emissions factors derived from intermittent stack testing measurements, input feed stream data, and plant operating parameters. Emissions factors may have significant uncertainty, particularly for sources where feed stream metal content is highly variable. Continuous measurements are needed to provide superior accuracy, but current technology is limited and cost prohibitive. The proposed technology would meet that need with repetitive in-stack sampling using paired sorbent traps with periodic analysis of time-integrated samples collected over a period of several days. This approach is analogous to EPA Performance Specification 12B. This innovative and performance-based method will include robust quality controls, including pair agreement, breakthrough measurements, and spike recoveries. Technical feasibility was established during Phase I for three candidate sorbent traps, each using a different sorbent material. During Phase I, most simulated stack gas spike recoveries were measured within 75-125%. Phase II will optimize sorbent trap production, sample digestion, and analytical processes to improve these results, ensuring all target metals are recovered within an acceptable range, while also efficiently capturing and retaining metals from the sample gas stream. The sorbent trap method will be compared to Method 29 using Method 301 criteria. The proposed method is designed with particular focus on continuous sampling for hazardous waste combustors, metal smelting operations, iron and steel production, secondary smelting facilities, and coal-fired power plants. There are approximately 3300 individual point sources in the United States that fall within these categories. For continuous measurements, stationary sources will purchase these traps for use with continuous sampling equipment. For shortterm sampling as an alternative to Method 29, the customers are stack testing companies. Other customer categories will be discussed in the proposal. Continuous measurement of metal HAP emissions will improve EPA’s air emissions inventory and allow point sources to better understand their emissions. Sources that utilize control technologies to remove metals from the gas stream can use this information to optimize controls. For short-term testing, this method will benefit stack testers, who almost universally agree Method 29 is cumbersome, expensive, and hazardous.