SBIR-STTR Award

Handheld Trace Explosives Sampler
Award last edited on: 4/6/2015

Sponsored Program
SBIR
Awarding Agency
DHS
Total Award Amount
$850,000
Award Phase
2
Solicitation Topic Code
H-SB07.1-001
Principal Investigator
Stephen N Bunker

Company Information

Implant Sciences Corporation

500 Research Drive Unit 3
Wilmington, MA 01887
   (978) 752-1700
   info@implantsciences.com
   www.implantsciences.com
Location: Single
Congr. District: 06
County: Middlesex

Phase I

Contract Number: ----------
Start Date: ----    Completed: ----
Phase I year
2007
Phase I Amount
$100,000
Trace chemical sampling is most effective when both particles and vapor are collected due to the enhanced mass obtained. While vapor sampling is limited by the available vapor pressure of the target substance, particles are limited only by the three steps of 1) release from the surface, 2) transport to a collector/concentrator, and 3) collection efficiency for small particles. In addition, the real world problem of collecting unwanted contaminants must also be addressed. A non-contact handheld collection system is proposed that could readily be scaled to a variety of larger sampling applications. The system consists of an aerosol spray that is non-contaminating and leaves no residue, a small vortex attractor transport system capable of sampling up to a foot away, and a long life reusable collecting trap. The trap uses dynamic motion to enhance collection efficiency without sacrificing a simple cleaning method using brushing and self baking. The method of collection may employ either a default collection trap supplied with the unit or use adaptors to fit any porous collection traps commonly employed in the explosives detection industry. Alternately, a manufacturerÂ’s proprietary wiping system may be employed to wipe the chemical traces from the surface of the default trap.

Phase II

Contract Number: ----------
Start Date: ----    Completed: ----
Phase II year
2008
Phase II Amount
$750,000
Non contact trace explosives detection has not been comparable to results obtained from wipe sampling. Many issues, including finding a method to release particles from a surface, efficient particle and vapor transport, and limited particle and vapor trap collection efficiency have all limited the process. Other related issues have included cost of ownership, ease of contamination removal, and compatibility with existing detection equipment. This Phase II proposal summarizes work performed on a Phase I SBIR program to develop solutions for these problems. The methods used in the final prototype hand sampler include aerosol ablation for particle release, a vortex attractor for particle and vapor transport, and a planar stainless steel mesh with optional coating for particle and vapor collection