SBIR-STTR Award

Challenge Feedback Tool
Award last edited on: 3/23/2023

Sponsored Program
SBIR
Awarding Agency
DoEd
Total Award Amount
$1,200,000
Award Phase
2
Solicitation Topic Code
91990021R0001
Principal Investigator
Tanya Silva

Company Information

Future Engineers LLC

35 23rd Avenue Suite 3
Venice, CA 90291
   (202) 245-7550
   info@futureengineers.org
   www.futureengineers.org
Location: Single
Congr. District: 36
County: Los Angeles

Phase I

Contract Number: 91990021C0015
Start Date: 5/3/2021    Completed: 12/31/2021
Phase I year
2021
Phase I Amount
$200,000
Through prior IES-funded SBIR projects in 2016 and 2017, the developer created an online platform, Future Engineers, to administer educational challenges for students in or outside of K12 classrooms. This project will develop a new prototype component of the platform for adult mentors who are professionals with STEM backgrounds. The prototype will include a portal for mentors to evaluate and provide written feedback to students in response to their submissions to STEM challenges that align to course content, and an interface for students to safely engage with mentors to facilitate an iterative process to refine and improve the submission to completion. At the end of Phase I, in a pilot study with 10 middle school classrooms with 25 students per classroom participating in challenges, the researchers will examine the feasibility of mentors providing and students receiving formative feedback during a challenge project, the ease of students' integrating the feedback as they iteratively refine their project, and mentors' and students' level of engagement during the process.

Phase II

Contract Number: 91990022C0046
Start Date: 5/15/2022    Completed: 5/14/2024
Phase II year
2022
Phase II Amount
$1,000,000
Purpose: This project team will develop a product to improve the feedback that adult judges provide to students who have entered online educational challenges. Online challenges provide students the opportunity to present proposals in different areas of education, including STEM. Despite the potential of challenges as an educational experience, the large volume of submissions often prevents judges from providing formative feedback to students to help improve a concept and deepen learning. Project Activities: In the Phase I project in 2021, the team developed a new prototype portal for adult judges to provide feedback and to safely engage with students who submitted entries in response to challenges. The prototype also included a machine learning algorithm to identify themes in student entries and provided judges with suggestions on what feedback to provide. At the end of Phase I, researchers completed a pilot study with 11 educators, 291 students in Grades 3 to 8, and 218 judges who participated in student challenges. In Phase II, the team will fully develop the portal and will make iterative refinements based on feedback from students, judges, and educators at major production milestones. After development is complete, researchers will conduct a pilot study with 44 middle school classrooms (15 per treatment condition) with approximately 25 students per classroom (for a total of 1100 students) to test the feasibility, usability, fidelity of implementation, and the promise of the new portal to support outcomes. All classes will participate in a student challenge, half will receive feedback from judges, and half will not. Researchers will examine changes in students' perceptions of their ability to be successful with challenges using items from the Competency Beliefs in STEM measure, and a researcher developed measure for engagement in learning. Product: Through prior IES-funded SBIR projects in 2016 and 2017, the developer created an online platform, Future Engineers, to administer educational challenges for students in or outside of K–12 classrooms. This project will develop a new portal for adult judges to evaluate and provide written feedback to students in response to their submissions and an interface for students to safely engage with mentors to facilitate an iterative process to refine and improve the submission. The website will require educator or parent approval for student involvement, and will generate additional teacher-assigned class awards, superlatives, or badges that get displayed in the gallery to provide more acknowledgment.